What is Brave New World's critique of the relationship between science and morality?

• A. Science is inherently moral and should govern society.
• B. Morality can exist independent of science without consequences.
• C. It argues that unregulated science can erode humanity; ethical oversight is necessary to prevent dehumanization.
• D. The book advocates for unregulated scientific advancement.

Answer: (C)

Science without ethical boundaries can erode humanity, and ethical oversight is essential to prevent dehumanization. Brave New World shows a society where scientific power—reproducing people, tailoring genetics, conditioning, and using soma to suppress discomfort—creates outward order and happiness but crushes autonomy, genuine emotion, and moral reflection. The story argues that knowledge and technique gain true value only when guided by moral consideration and accountability; without that guidance, science can strip away what makes us human. The portrayal isn’t anti-science, but a warning about unregulated scientific progress that ignores consequences and dignity.