What does the novel suggest about the relationship between science and humanity when moral oversight is absent?

• A. It argues that unregulated science can erode humanity; ethical oversight is necessary to prevent dehumanization.
• B. Science is inherently moral and should govern society.
• C. Morality can exist independent of science without consequences.
• D. The book advocates for unregulated scientific advancement.

Answer: (A)

When moral oversight is absent, the novel shows science as a powerful force that can reorganize human life to maximize stability and efficiency, but at the cost of what makes us human. Through genetic engineering, conditioning, and widespread control of reproduction, the World State predefines social roles, erases family and genuine human bonds, and suppresses individuality and critical thought. Tools like soma dull suffering and authentic emotion, keeping people content while hollowing out meaning and autonomy. This vividly demonstrates that scientific power without ethical limits can dehumanize people, turning them into predictable parts of a machine rather than free, compassionate individuals. The takeaway is that ethical oversight is necessary to protect humanity, because without it science risks eroding dignity, choice, and deep human connection. The other views don’t fit the text: the book does not present science as inherently moral or as something that should govern society on its own, nor does it imply morality can exist independently of science without consequences, nor advocate unregulated advancement.